[PATCH] Add a TEST-OP-TEST-FAILURE condition for test libraries to sub-class

[Robert Goldman]

On 16 Sep 2019, at 4:23, Vladimir Sedach wrote:

> Stelian, I think there is something wrong with the reply you sent.
> The Subject header is mangled in the Mailman archives where I spotted
> it. I never received this email:
>
> https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/asdf-devel/2019-September/006356.html

FWIW, I didn't either.  The display of the subject line on the mailman 
site may suggest why (I don't know):

```
=?UTF-8?Q?Re:_PATCH:_SIGNAL_a_condition_on_test_failures, 
_for_use_with_A?= SDF:TEST-SYSTEM
```

>
>> I'd like to have something that gathers enough information to allow
>> building a suitable integration with continuous integration systems
>> (there are already a few ad-hoc ones around).
>
> What exactly would that look like?

Don't a lot of these CI systems just rely on the exit status of a build 
step?  I typically just wrap a trivial script around running the test-op 
from fiveam-asdf, and make lisp exit with a non-zero status when it 
encounters an error.  That's been sufficient for me, but then I tend to 
just look at success or failure, and read the console output on 
failures.  I don't do anything fancy like generate XML...

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/asdf-devel/attachments/20190916/96c6c96e/attachment.html>