A thing I should know myself....

[Robert Goldman]

Not sure why that took 8 days to post...

On 14 Jun 2018, at 12:50, Robert Goldman wrote:

> I have a library that provides `DEF-UNIMPLEMENTED` as a macro for 
> defining stub functions.  When you compile a file with unimplemented 
> functions, you get a warning of the type `FOO:UNIMPLEMENTED-STUB` in 
> my library `FOO`.
>
> I'd like to put in an asdf system definition a file spec something 
> like this:
>
> ```
> (:file "file-with-stubs"
>   :method (:around (o c) 
            (handler-bind 
> ((foo:unimplemented-stub
>                               #'(lambda (c)
>                                   (print c)
>                                   (muffle-warning c))
>                 (call-next-method)))
> ```
> but, of course, the package `foo` doesn't exist when this is read 
> (although I could put `(asdf:load-system "foo")` upstream of the 
> enclosing defsystem).
>
> This isn't a case that's nicely consistent with Faré's hack for 
> translating strings or keyword symbols, nor does it seem easy to use 
> `find-symbol` for this purpose.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> thanks,
> r
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/asdf-devel/attachments/20180622/284e0f01/attachment.html>