[asdf-devel] 1.675 bug

Faré fahree at gmail.com
Thu Apr 15 03:52:18 UTC 2010


Ahem. Does it work better with 1.679?

It's hard to test these things without access to a Windows machine...

Also, I realize that in Unix, I rely on absolute-pathname-p meaning
"a completely qualified pathname", which breaks down on Windows,
with potentially "interesting" implications. Sigh.

[ François-René ÐVB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ]
The main difference between a computer salesman and a used car salesman is
that the used car salesman can probably drive and knows when he's lying.
	- Peter da Silva



On 14 April 2010 20:46, szergling <senatorzergling at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I'm having trouble hot-upgrading asdf. My old setup was not checked
> out of a repository, but does have a file modified date of
> 2007-06-18. I also use asdf-binary-locations version "0.3.8".
>
> To begin with, I have created the following config file
> (~ is at c:/home)
>
> ~/.config/common-lisp/source-registry.conf
>
> (:source-registry
>  (:directory "e:/src/ltk-0.90/")
>  (:tree "c:/home/code/lisp/libs/")
>  (:exclude "_darcs")
>  :ignore-inherited-configuration)
>
> I then load-file asdf.lisp from Slime. My clisp-2.47 (non-cygwin
> Windows) is previously already running with asdf,
> asdf-binary-locations, and many systems loaded (and other random work
> done).
>
> I then tried to load a system that I could previously load just fine,
> in this case ironclad_0.27.
>
> CL-USER> (asdf:load-system :ironclad)
> ; loading system definition from
> C:\home\code\lisp\libs\ironclad_0.27\ironclad.asd into #<PACKAGE
> ASDF0>
> ;;  Loading file C:\home\code\lisp\libs\ironclad_0.27\ironclad.asd ...
> ; registering #<SYSTEM :IRONCLAD #x26F7286D> as IRONCLAD
> ; registering #<SYSTEM IRONCLAD-TESTS #x26FE5225> as IRONCLAD-TESTS
> ;;  Loaded file C:\home\code\lisp\libs\ironclad_0.27\ironclad.asd
>
> ; No value
>
> This gave the following error.
>
> TRANSLATE-PATHNAME: replacement pieces (NIL NIL
>  (:DIRECTORY #1="home" #2="code" #3="lisp" #4="libs"
>  #5="ironclad_0.27")
>  "package" "fas" :NEWEST) do not fit into #P"C:\\Documents and
> Settings\\chewyong\\Local Settings\\Temporary Internet
> Files\\common-lisp\\**\\*.*"
>   [Condition of type SIMPLE-ERROR]
>
>
> I browsed around in the stack trace (yes clisp stack traces are ugly),
> and looked deeper into this particular frame:
>
> ...
>
>  17: <1/1718> #<SYSTEM-FUNCTION TRANSLATE-PATHNAME>
>     [1712] EVAL frame for form (TRANSLATE-PATHNAME
> (ASDF::DIRECTORIZE-PATHNAME-HOST-DEVICE ASDF::P) ASDF::ABSOLUTE-SOURCE
> ASDF::DESTINATION)
>      Locals:
>        ASDF::ABSOLUTE-SOURCE = #P"\\**\\*.*"
>        ASDF::ROOT = #P"\\"
>        ASDF::DESTINATION = #P"C:\\Documents and
> Settings\\chewyong\\Local Settings\\Temporary Internet..
>        ASDF::SOURCE = T
>        #:LIST-13280 = ((T
>                         ..))
>        ASDF::P = #P"\\home\\code\\lisp\\libs\\ironclad_0.27\\package.fas"
>        #:PATTERN-13281 = (T
>                           ..)
>        #:TYPECASE-KEY-13279 =
> #P"C:\\home\\code\\lisp\\libs\\ironclad_0.27\\package.fas"
>        #:TYPECASE-KEY-13278 =
> #P"C:\\home\\code\\lisp\\libs\\ironclad_0.27\\package.fas"
>        ASDF::PATH = #P"C:\\home\\code\\lisp\\libs\\ironclad_0.27\\package.fas"
> ...
>
>
> In particular, I'm guessing that this is related to truenamize (has it
> taken the wrong branch?) with respect to (line 677 on my version of
> asdf.lisp)
>
> (ignore-errors (return (truename p)))
>
> Am I close enough? See the following:
>
> CL-USER> (truename (merge-pathnames
> #P"\\home\\code\\lisp\\libs\\ironclad_0.27\\package.fas"))
>
> ==>
>
> TRUENAME: File #1=#P"C:\\home\\code\\lisp\\libs\\ironclad_0.27\\package.fas"
> does not exist
>   [Condition of type SYSTEM::SIMPLE-FILE-ERROR]
>
> My package.fas, due to asdf-binary-locations, has been stored
> previously in
> ~/code/lisp/libs/ironclad_0.27/clisp-2.47-win32-i386/package.fas
>
> I hope this is useful for fixing asdf + a-b-l hot upgrade. I can restart a
> new Lisp and give full backtraces or other further info, should that
> be necessary.
>
> Cheers.
>
> _______________________________________________
> asdf-devel mailing list
> asdf-devel at common-lisp.net
> http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
>




More information about the asdf-devel mailing list