- Feb 15, 2013
-
-
Alejandro R Sedeño authored
Follow up to the last commit; I should really know better.
-
Alejandro R Sedeño authored
-
- Feb 12, 2013
-
-
Alejandro R Sedeño authored
[proto -> lisp] 1) Do case-sensitive comparisons between the name we have and the name we would derive from #'CLASS-NAME->PROTO. Case matters. 2) Do not downcase :name options when we're outputting them to a .lisp file. Again, case matters. 3) Preserve names for PROTOBUF-SERVICEs, as necessary. 4) Preserve names, input-names, and output-names for PROTOBUF-METHODs, as necessary.
-
Alejandro R Sedeño authored
-
- Feb 11, 2013
-
-
Alejandro R Sedeño authored
Here we should have been consuming both the thing we would be printing and the indentation we would use on the next line, but in the case where the printed thing was nil, we would only consume it, and not the subsequent indentation. It worked out here, but the mistake could only be made once, and only at the end.
-
Alejandro R Sedeño authored
-
Alejandro R Sedeño authored
-
- Jan 07, 2013
-
-
Alejandro R Sedeño authored
Robert Brown's protobuf package falls back on the java_package option as the lisp package name when there isn't a package declaration in the schema. Emulate that behavior for better compatibility between code generated by the packages.
-
- Jan 04, 2013
-
-
Alejandro R Sedeño authored
-
Alejandro R Sedeño authored
-
Alejandro R Sedeño authored
-
- Jan 03, 2013
-
-
Alejandro R Sedeño authored
-
Alejandro R Sedeño authored
-
Alejandro R Sedeño authored
-
Alejandro R Sedeño authored
Rather than hard-code assumptions about the size of a FIXNUM, check the size of FIXNUM at compile time and generate code appropriate for the number of bits we're working with, with FIXNUM optimizations in place if appropriate. Includes some changes from swmckay@gmail.com.
-
Alejandro R Sedeño authored
-
Scott McKay authored
-
-
Scott McKay authored
-
- Jan 02, 2013
-
-
Paul Weiss authored
Signed-off-by: Alejandro R Sedeño <asedeno@google.com>
-
- Dec 17, 2012
-
-
Alejandro R Sedeño authored
-
Alejandro R Sedeño authored
-
Alejandro R Sedeño authored
-
Alejandro R Sedeño authored
-
Alejandro R Sedeño authored
Inspired by: https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/docs/proto#extensions Nested Extensions: "A common pattern is to define extensions inside the scope of the extension's field type – for example, here's an extension to Foo of type Baz, where the extension is defined as part of Baz"
-
Alejandro R Sedeño authored
-
Alejandro R Sedeño authored
-
Alejandro R Sedeño authored
-
Alejandro R Sedeño authored
-
Alejandro R Sedeño authored
-
Alejandro R Sedeño authored
This fixes the unit test that broke in the previous commit
-
- Dec 12, 2012
-
-
Alejandro R Sedeño authored
-
- Dec 10, 2012
-
-
Alejandro R Sedeño authored
-
Alejandro R Sedeño authored
-
- Dec 09, 2012
-
-
-
Scott McKay authored
-
- Dec 06, 2012
-
-
Alejandro R Sedeño authored
-
Alejandro R Sedeño authored
-
- Dec 05, 2012
-
-
Alejandro R Sedeño authored
Reviewer: tunes
-
Alejandro R Sedeño authored
-